The Udicon has already addressed the issue by submitting their concerns Antitrust Authority Communication
How can you determine whether an advertisement is misleading or not? Where is the line between legitimate marketing activities and unfair practices? What damage could result from the receipt of wrong messages, intentionally or not, may be ambiguous and equivocal? These are some of the dilemmas that we encounter in analyzing the varied world of advertising and, most importantly, in assessing the effects this has on the mass of the receptors that it should be remembered forever, hiding behind a single indistinct countless categories is differ in age, education, social status and degree of impressionability. In this regard
long ago discussing the miraculous new product available to consumers: it is called Rebootizer and is a digestive drink that, based on the action of plant extracts and fruit, is the new hope to beat the hangover. And here is the sore point of the matter. Who can deny the incredible appeal that can have a drink that can get rid of the symptoms of un'ubriacatura? How many young people would immediately be willing to experiment on their skin the miraculous effect of a product that also has the advantage of being 100% natural? The question
is very difficult, and many hidden dangers behind the enthusiastic proclamations that accompanied the emergence and spread in several countries, including Italy. Simply dial the name of the drink magic on Facebook, YouTube and other search engines to discover something very interesting: although the site Rebootizer is clear that the consumption of this drink does not allow driving under the influence of alcohol, there are videos about it to the contrary. And then, even if it passed over the etymology of the product itself misleading (in English means reset to reboot, bring to their original state), analyzing the FAQ site Rebootizer appears ominous statement: "It prevents the hangover. " Raise your hand if you, reading this statement, at least not see a huge trap, because it "prevent hangover" and "bring to their original state" can not exclude that the interpretation by the reader may be that the effects of alcohol drinking Rebootizer disappear and we can behave as if nothing had happened, such as making the wheel after having swallowed maybe a couple of cocktails at the disco.
The effectiveness of this drink in canceling the effects of hangover and in reducing the presence of alcohol in the blood is to be verified, if there are no rigorous scientific evidence about that, given the sensitivity of the issue, are absolutely essential. Recall that misleading advertising is defined as a business practice that includes information corresponding to the truth or not, though factually correct, in any way, including overall presentation, deceives or is likely to mislead the average consumer (Legislative Decree 206 / 2005, Art. 21): reading the Facebook page dedicated to Rebootizer seems obvious that all the people who have signed up to it are interested in the possibility of using as a defense against Rebootizer hangover, to be able to return home after taking alcohol . The
Udicon has already addressed the issue by submitting their concerns to the Authority Supervisor Communication and asked it to verify the existence of the investigation to begin in order to verify the existence of unfair trade practices and to order, if appropriate, the suspension of advertising by an alert. Given that the advertising is always to blame, because the result of widespread malpractice intended to defraud the public-consumatrori, we think it particularly serious cases where it can cause damage far more serious: in this regard we recall that Saturday night , caused by people who get to driving while intoxicated, are the major cause of juvenile mortality. We urgently need a serious reflection on the subject.
0 comments:
Post a Comment